Skip to content

An Agreement To Be Enforceable Must Be Written And Registered

With respect to trade agreements, it is generally accepted that the parties intended to enter into a contract. An antenuptial agreement, also known as a marriage contract, is a contract entered into by the parties before marriage, the union of stands or people who wish to marry or conclude between them. The content of a conjugal agreement is very different, but it generally contains provisions relating to the division of ownership and the assistance of the spouse in the event of divorce or dissolution of the marriage. It may also contain terms relating to the forfeiture of assets following a divorce for adultery. In India, marriage contracts are not valid legally or under the laws of marriage, because they do not consider marriage as a contract, but in Goa it is legally applicable under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. A marriage in India is treated as a religious link between husband and wife and marital agreements are not socially accepted in the country. However, these agreements are subject to the Indian Contracts Act and have as much sanctity as any other oral or written contract. In the famous case of the Food Corporation of India v. Vikas Majdar Sahkari Mandli Ltd., the Apex court stated that if an oral agreement is entered before the court but is not proven, the person will be entitled to compensation under Section 70 of the Law as a principle of quantum seeduit. This principle means that the work is done beyond the contract and that the defendant has resorted to work.

(g) A agrees to sell a horse worth 1,000 to 10 Rs. A disputes that his consent to the agreement was disclosed. When a verbal agreement includes the condition of a valid agreement, it is considered a contract. In the case of Sheela Gehlot v. Sonu Kochar – Ors Delhi High Court found that oral agreements are valid and enforceable and there could be no dispute about this, unless there is something that needs to be written. As in a treaty, there must necessarily be a proposal and an adoption. The validity of an oral agreement cannot be questioned. A written agreement is considered important because an oral agreement cannot be presented as evidence in court.

The burden of proof of the oral agreement rests with the party claiming to consider such an agreement. For example, California law, which corresponds to the UCC, explicitly states that contracts for the sale of goods costing more than $500 are not enforceable, “unless there is sufficient written reference to indicate that a sales contract between the parties being applied for execution has been signed by its agent or a mandative broker.” (3) it is a matter of imposing, in whole or in part, by the person who has been seized for this purpose or by his agent, generally authorized on that name or especially on that behalf, to impose payment by the creditor, but for the right to limit the remedies.