This measure is likely the result of Sarawak`s request to postpone implementation until July to a later date, which was rejected. But what is interesting is that Sarawak Minister of State for Tourism Datuk Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah said that tourism was an issue that should be discussed as part of the 1963 agreement on Malaysia: unity is a common theme every year on Malaysia Day, the holiday celebrated last week, which marks Malaysia`s day a federation in 1963. This restriction is contained in Section 66 of the Immigration Act 1959/63 and was included for MA63. The Malaysian agreement or the Agreement on Malaysia between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Federation of Malaya, North Borneo, Sarawak and Singapore was the agreement that linked Borneo, Sarawak and Singapore to the existing states of the Malaya Federation, the resulting Union and the name of Malaysia.   Singapore was subsequently expelled from Malaysia and became an independent state on 9 August 1965.  After the proposal to amend the Malaysian Constitution for 2019 concerning the same status of Sabah and Sarawak was not adopted, the Federal Government of Malaysia agreed to review the treaty violation agreement with the “Malaysia Agreement Review Select Committee” and authorized a ma63 panel team to prepare a final report on the 1963 agreement by August 31, 2019, which will be presented at the next special cabinet meeting. As of 23 July 2019, seven issues relating to the 1963 agreement had reached a common agreement, while 14 other issues still needed to be addressed and are expected to be resolved before the 31 August deadline.   The seven issues agreed were the signatories of the Malaysian Agreement, which arrived in London on 12 July 1963. Image of the Borneo Office. This is the 1963 Malaysian Agreement (MA63), which sets out the conditions: the three states agreed to merge the Malaya Federation for the creation of Malaysia: on 11 September 1963, just four days before the creation of the new Malaysian Federation, the Kelantan State Government requested a declaration that the Malaysian agreements and the Malaysia And Malaysia Act were null and void or that they did not engage the State of Kelantan, even though they were valid. [after whom?] [Citation required] Kelantan`s government argued that both the Malaysian agreement and the Malaysian Act were not binding on Kelantan, given that Malaysian law had in fact abolished the Malaya Federation and that this was at odds with the Malaya Federation of 1957, that the proposed amendments required the agreement of each of the constituent states of the Malaya Federation, including Kelantan, and that this had not been done. [Citation required] Section 161, paragraph 1, prohibits any law that limits Sabah and Sarawak`s right to use English for official purposes for up to ten years from 16 September 1963. Under the 1963 Malaysian Agreement (MA63), Sabah and Sarawak were equal partners in the former Malaya federation, but that reputation has since eroded.